Patna High Court
CR. MISC./35375/2026 of Ramchandra Singh Vs The State of Bihar on 21 May 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35375 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2026 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Ramchandra Singh, S/o Ramrakchhi Singh, Resident of Village- Maraiya, Ward No. 12, P.O.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35375 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2026 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ======================================================
Ramchandra Singh, S/o Ramrakchhi Singh, Resident of Village- Maraiya, Ward No. 12, P.O.- Pipralatif, P.S.- Parbatta (Maraiya), District- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
21-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conferencing.
2. The instant application for regular bail has been filed by the petitioner in connection with Parbatta (Maraiya) P.S. Case no. 119 of 2026 instituted for the offence under Sections 103(1), 61 (2) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that Raja and Sudama Kumar have fired at the brother of the informant who succumbed to the injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in latter part of the F.I.R., it is alleged that the petitioner along with others have hatched a conspiracy wherein the brother of the informant was killed. Learned counsel for the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35375 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
has submitted that from the perusal of the F.I.R, itself, it is clear that specific allegation of firing is against Raja Kumar and Sudama.
5. Countering this, the learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner as there is direct allegation against the co-accused Raja and Sudama. There is no allegation of any overt act against this petitioner. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent, he is in custody since 19.03.2026.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Parbatta (Maraiya) P.S. Case no. 119 of 2026, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria.
Khushbu/ Utkarsh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T