Patna High Court

CR. MISC./34913/2026 of Gaurav Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar on 20 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34913 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2026 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Gaurav Kumar Sah, S/O Late Shyam Prasad Sah @ Shyamlal Sah, R/O Mohalla- Mohaddinagar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34913 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2026 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI District- Bhagalpur ======================================================

Gaurav Kumar Sah, S/O Late Shyam Prasad Sah @ Shyamlal Sah, R/O

Mohalla- Mohaddinagar, P.S.- Babarganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Manendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

20-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 21(b), 22 of the NDPS Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the informant has informed the police that a green bag was lying unclaimed. On this information, the bag was searched and from there altogether 102.80 gram of Brown Sugar and a mobile phone was recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that, nothing has been Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34913 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026

recovered from possession of the petitioner. The bag from which the recovery has been made does not belong to the petitioner. It is also submitted that all the witnesses to the seizure list are police personnel, and the police have not complied the mandatory provisions of Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. It is further argued that the alleged recovered quantity is more than small quantity but significantly less than commercial quantity. The petitioner is in custody since 03.03.2026 and has no criminal antecedent.

6. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Kotwali (Bhagalpur) P.S. Case No. 27 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur/concerned Court.

khushbu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead