Patna High Court
CR. MISC./34675/2026 of Shiv Kumar @ Shiv Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar on 20 May 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34675 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2025 Thana- KHUTAUNA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Shiv Kumar @ Shiv Kumar Mahto S/O Late Ramchandra Mahto @ Ramsundar Mahto R/O Village-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34675 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2025 Thana- KHUTAUNA District- Madhubani ======================================================
Shiv Kumar @ Shiv Kumar Mahto S/O Late Ramchandra Mahto @
Ramsundar Mahto R/O Village- Mahuliya, Ward No. 12, P.S.- Phulparas, Dist.- Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Shivnandan Bharti, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
20-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conferencing.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 194 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 274, 275 & 3(5) of the BNS & Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from an Auto altogether 540 litres illicit foreign liquor was recovered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the driver of the auto managed to escape and he was not apprehended on the spot. He has further submitted that nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34675 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of the BNSS while making seizure. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner has been framed in this case only because he is the owner of the seized auto. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent of similar nature and he is in judicial custody since 12.03.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that the petitioner shall not indulge himself in similar nature of offence in future. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Special Judge (Excise Act), Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No.194 of 2025.
khushbu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T