Patna High Court
CR. MISC./34781/2026 of Sudhir Sahni @ Sudhir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 15 May 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33927 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2026 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Raju Yadav @ Raju Rai S/o Devendra Yadav @ Devendra Rai Resident of Naua Chak, Bhagwatpur, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33927 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2026 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur
======================================================
Raju Yadav @ Raju Rai S/o Devendra Yadav @ Devendra Rai Resident of Naua Chak, Bhagwatpur, P.S.- Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur, Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 34769 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2026 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur
======================================================
Ayush Gupta @ Ayush Rai Son of Sunil Gupta R/O Vill.- Tajpur, P.S.- Tajpur, District - Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 34781 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2026 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur
======================================================
Sudhir Sahni @ Sudhir Kumar S/o Late Govind Sahni (wrongly typed in impugned order as Govind Sahni) Resident of Village- Motipur, P.S.- Tajpur, District- Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 33927 of 2026)
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Keshav Bhardwaj, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 34769 of 2026)
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Anish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar, APP
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 34781 of 2026)
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Anish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
15-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33927 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026
2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 64 of 2026 instituted for the offence under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that from a pick-up vehicle, altogether 1109.52 liters of illicit foreign liquor was recovered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that the petitioners are neither the owner nor the driver of the said pick-up vehicle. They are not apprehended on spot rather their names were disclosed by the apprehended person. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. They have no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner, namely, Raju Yadav has submitted that the address of the petitioner does not match with Raju Yadav as named by the driver of the said pick-up who was apprehended on spot. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also submitted there is no independent witness of the seizure list rather they are police personnel and police has not complied Section 105 of BNSS while Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33927 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026
preparing the seizure list.
5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners and has submitted that petitioner, namely, Raju Yadav is having criminal antecedent of three cases, petitioner, namely, Ayush Gupta is having criminal antecedent of four cases and petitioner, namely, Sudhir Sahni is having criminal antecedent of three cases.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 64 of 2026, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise-II, Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of B.N.S.S, Shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T