Gujarat High Court
SCA/5184/1982 of . Vs . . on 12 December 1995
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5184 OF 1982 Date of decision: 12-12-1995 For Approval and Signature The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. K. KESHOTE 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
��Date of decision: 12-12-1995
For Approval and Signature
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. K. KESHOTE
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may beallowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether their Lordships wish to see thefair copy of the judgment?
4. Whether this case involves a substantialquestion of law as to the interpretationof the Constitution of India,1950 or anyorder made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to theCivil Judge?
Mr. S.M. Mazgaokar for the petitionerMr. S.K.Zaveri for the respondents.
����Coram: S. K. KESHOTE,J
�����(12-12-1995)
ORAL JUDGMENT:
The petitioner who was working as Gram Sevak atLimbodra in the office of the Sub Divisional AgriculturalOfficer has filed this writ petition in which he prayed thatthe respondents be directed to treat the services of the petitioner as Gram Sevak, Limbodra, continuous upon hisselection and regular appointment to the said post as perorders at Annexure-E (collectively) with effect from25-11-1982 and to give him all consequential benefits likesurrender leave pay etc., arising from such appointment. Ithas further been prayed to grant an injunction restrainingthe respondents from implementing the orders dated22-11-1982 (annexure F) and from preventing the petitionerfrom discharging his duties as Gram Sevak, Libodra. Underorder dated 22-11-1982 (annexure-F) the petitioner wasordered to be released from service as Gram Sevak.
Page 1 of 2
2. This writ petition came up for consideration before this Court on 9-12-1982, when notice was issued and byad-interim relief the respondents were restrained fromfilling the post without permission of the Court. On17-12-1982 rule was issued and the ad- interim relief which was granted earlier was modified and the respondents weredirected to permit the petitioner to resume his dutieswithout prejudice to the contentions of either side.
3. Today both the learned counsel for the parties have admitted that in pursuance of the order of this court thepetitioner was allowed to resume his duties and he continuesto work on the post till date. Both the counsel for theparties stated that they have come to an agreement that thiswrit petition be disposed of with the direction that theservices of the petitioner will be considered forregularisation as per Government Circular dated 18-12-1991,a copy of which has been produced today in the Court.
4. In the result this writ petition is disposed of withthe direction that the case of the petitioner forregularisation on the post of Gram Sevak shall be consideredby the respondents in accordance with Government Circulardated 18-12-1991, and the petitioner, on regularisation ofhis services, shall be entitled to all consequentialbenefits. Rule made absolute in the aforesaid terms, withno order as to costs.
���............��
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…