Patna High Court
MA/1119/2025 of Sudhindra Pratap Singh Vs Nivedita on 22 April 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.1119 of 2025 ====================================================== Sudhindra Pratap Singh, Son of Sri Parshuram Singh, Resident of Village Korari- Khurd, P.O. and P.S.- Daroundha, District- Siwan- 841233. ... ... Appellant/s Versus Nivedita,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.1119 of 2025
======================================================
Sudhindra Pratap Singh, Son of Sri Parshuram Singh, Resident of Village Korari- Khurd, P.O. and P.S.- Daroundha, District- Siwan- 841233.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Nivedita, Wife of Sudhindra Pratap Singh, Daughter of Sri Sambhu Singh, Resident of Mohalla Chitragupta Nagar, Dak Bangla Road, P.S.- Siwan Town, District- Siwan.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s
:
Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Rai, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR SINGH )
22-04-2026 Heard the learned counsel for appellant.
2. The instant miscellaneous appeal has been preferred by the appellant (husband) against the order dated 04.11.2025 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Siwan, in Divorce Case No.146 of 2023, whereby the maintenance petition filed by the petitioner/appellant under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act was rejected.
3. The foresaid case has been listed under the heading “For Order (On Office Notes)”.
4. On the matter being taken up, the Office has pointed out that the second copy of the brief has not been filed with the memo of appeal. Another objection regarding the Patna High Court MA No.1119 of 2025(3) dt.22-04-2026
maintainability of this miscellaneous appeal has also been observed by the Office.
5. On putting a query regarding the aforesaid observations made by the Office, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant may be allowed to withdraw this miscellaneous appeal with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available to him.
6. In view of the above, the instant miscellaneous appeal is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
7. The Office is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order dated 04.11.2025 and vakalatnama of the appellant to the learned counsel for the appellant within three days after retaining the xerox copy of the same on record.
manoj/aditya- (Sanjay Kumar Singh , J) (Sourendra Pandey, J) U