None None on 30 September 2011

Dl.August 25,1.2022

R.V.W. 51 of 2020

Parimal Mistry

Vs.

Union of India & ors.

Mr. Anindya Lahiri,

Mr. Samrat Dey Paul,

…for the petitioner.

Mr. Partha Ghosh,

Ms. Purabi Saha Das,

…for the respondents no. 1 and 2.

Mr. Devesh Tripathy,

…for the respnodents no. 3 and 4.

Mr. Anil Kumar Gupta,

…for the respondent no. 5.

The matter appeared in the list yesterday with the clearindication that it would be taken up today. None of the respondentshave filed their affidavits.

It appears that response of all the respondents, moreparticularly, that of the respondents no. 3 and 4, in relation to theNotification dated September 30, 2011 is required. In spite ofrepeated opportunities being given to the said respondents, till dateno affidavit has been filed by the said respondents.

This is not a regular Bench. We deprecate the conductof the respondents no. 3 and 4. Upon payment of cost of Rs. 5,000/-by the respondents no. 3 and 4 to the petitioner within a week fromdate, time to file affidavit by the said respondents is extendedperemptorily by ten days from date upon prior service of the sameto the learned advocate for the petitioner. Reply thereto, if any, is to dns be filed by the petitioner within one week thereafter.

The matter stands adjourned till three weeks from date.

( Soumen Sen, J. )

( Saugata Bhattacharyya, J. )