Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/36103/2026 of MEHTAB ALI MANSURI AND ORS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR on 14 September 2026

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36103-2026 Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 MEHTAB ALI MANSURI AND ORS ...Petitioners Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Ms. Bhanu Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Ayush Ahuja, Advocate for

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-36103-2026

Date of Decision: 09.07.2026

MEHTAB ALI MANSURI AND ORS

...Petitioners

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present:

Ms. Bhanu Sharma, Advocate and

Mr. Ayush Ahuja, Advocate

for the petitioners.

Mr. Surender Singh Pannu, Addl, AG, Haryana.

VIRINDER AGGARWAL

, J.

(Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (erstwhile Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 16.01.2026 (Annexure P-7) passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hansi, in Complaint bearing CNR No. HRHSA10032872022 (CIS No. NACT-257 of 2022), whereby the petitioners were declared proclaimed persons, as well as the consequential FIR No. 241 dated 23.04.2026 (Annexure P-8), registered under Section 209 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Hansi City, District Hansi, Haryana, on the ground that the impugned order was passed without due service upon the petitioners and in violation of the mandatory procedure prescribed under law.

2. After addressing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned trial Court and raise all such pleas and contentions as may be available to the petitioners in accordance with law. KUMUD VERMA 2026.07.09 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-36103-2026

Page 1 of 2

3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

4. It is, however, clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, and all the pleas available to the petitioners shall remain open to be urged before the learned trial Court, which shall consider the same independently and in accordance with law. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 09.07.2026 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2026.07.09 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead