Punjab and Haryana High Court
RA-CW/276/2025 of SURENDER KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** RA-CW-276-2025(O&M) IN CWP-15850-2024 Date of decision : 11.09.2026 Surender Kumar and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR.
RA-CW-276-2025(O&M) IN
CWP-15850-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
***
RA-CW-276-2025(O&M) IN CWP-15850-2024
Date of decision : 11.09.2026
Surender Kumar and others
... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
Present:
Mr.Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the applicant-petitioners.
Mr.Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A. G. Haryana.
VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is a review application under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 CPC and part A(a) Chapter-1, Volume V of the High Court Rules for review of the judgment dated 21.05.2025.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioners has submitted that the petitioners has also made a prayer in the amended writ petition for a direction to the respondents to pay awarded amount of compensation along with interest. It is submitted that the applicant-petitioners would withdraw the present review application but liberty be granted to the applicant- petitioners to move a representation to respondent no.3 on the aspect of the interest and respondent no.3 be directed to consider the said representation in a time bound manner and in case the representation is found to be meritorious, then, the necessary relief be also granted to the petitioners as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.09.11 17:39 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment
RA-CW-276-2025(O&M) IN CWP-15850-2024
applicant-petitioners has further submitted that the present judgment should not come in the way of the petitioners in pursuing and agitating the said right.
3. Learned State counsel has submitted that in case any such representation is filed, respondent no.3 would consider the same in accordance with law within a period of three months.
4. Keeping in view the above said facts and circumstances and the limited prayer made on behalf of the applicant-petitioners, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the present review application with liberty to the petitioners to move a representation to respondent no.3 on the aspect of interest and respondent no.3 is directed to consider and decide the said representation within a period of three months from the date of filing of the said representation in accordance with law by passing a speaking order. Respondent no.3 would consider the said representation on the above said aspect independently without being influenced by the observations made in the judgment dated 21.05.2025.
5. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of in view of the abovesaid order.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE
(ALOK JAIN) September 11, 2026.
JUDGE Davinder Kumar
Whether speaking / reasoned
Yes/No
Whether reportable
Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.09.11 17:39 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment