Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/51755/2026 of SARTAJ SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.51755 of 2026 Date of Decision:- 11.09.2026 Sartaj Singh …..Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Divyansh Vats, Advocate for Mr.
126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.51755 of 2026 Date of Decision:- 11.09.2026
Sartaj Singh …..Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Divyansh Vats, Advocate for
Mr. Harchand Singh Batth, Advocate for the petitioner.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
The prayer in the present petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘the BNSS’) is for the issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 not to harass the petitioner and his family by conducting frequent raids at the house of the petitioner on the pretext of apprehending his father, who is involved in a criminal case.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 24.08.2026 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.2 but no action has been taken upon the same.
3. Notice of motion.
4.
Page 1 of 2
Mr. Rahul Jindal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
5. Having heard learned counsel and after perusing the case file, the petition in hand is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 24.08.2026 (Annexure P-5) in accordance with law.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) September 11, 2026
JUDGE Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.09.11 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…