Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/29548/2026 of SURINDER BAGGA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION PUNJAB on 11 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (121) Surinder Bagga State of Punjab CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Constitution of India, a prayer is made of issuance of a writ, in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents, under the ‘Old Pension Scheme’ Pension Scheme’
CWP-29548
IN
Surinder Ba
State of Pun
CORAM:
Present:
KULDEEP
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Constitution mandamus, under the ‘O Pension Sch and therefor
2. made the re respondents on date, w mandamus,
3. 8-2026 N THE HIGH COURT OF PU
AT CHANDIG
agga
Versus njab and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KU Mr. Virinder Ka. Shukla, Advo Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Pun **** P TIWARI, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition, c n of India, a prayer is made of is directing the respondents, to co Old Pension Scheme’ (OPS) inste heme’ (NPS), since the petitione re, he is entitled for the benefits u Learned counsel for the petition epresentation/legal notice dated s No.1 to 4. However, the said le which propelled him to file th upon the respondents concerned Notice of motion.
UNJAB AND HARYANA GARH CWP-29548-2026 Date of Decision : 11.09.2026
…Petitioner
...Respondents ULDEEP TIWARI ocate and njab. cast under Article 226/227 of th ssuance of a writ, in the nature onsider the case of the petition ead of ‘New Defined Contributo er is working prior to 01.01.200 under the OPS. ner submits that the petitioner ha d 25.06.2026 (Annexure P-10), egal notice has not been decided, he instant writ petition, seeki d, to take apt steps.
he of ner ry 04, ave to , as ing MANPREET SINGH 2026.09.12 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
CWP-29548
4. the respond objection, in decided the
5. been made b mandamus u the legal no order, after p
6. weeks, from
7.
8. its complian
September 1 Manpreet
8-2026 Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Pu dents/State, and waives services. n case, a mandamus is passed u legal notice (supra). In view of the above, since a b by the petitioner, this Court dee upon the competent respondent a otice dated 25.06.2026 (Annex providing adequate opportunity The exercise (supra), shall be c m the date of receipt of certified c Disposed of accordingly. Copy of this order be conveyed nce.
11, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
unjab, accepts notice on behalf . He fairly submits that he has upon the authorities concerned, bona fide and innocuous prayer h ems it fit and appropriate to pas amongst the respondents, to deci ure P-10), by passing a speaki of hearing to the petitioner. carried out within a period of fo copy of this order. d to the respondents, forthwith, f
(KULDEEP TIWARI)
JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No f of no to has s a ide ing our for MANPREET SINGH 2026.09.12 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment