Punjab and Haryana High Court

CWP/9356/2001 of YOGESH KUMAR Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 11 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9356-2001 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.09.2026 YOGESH KUMAR ..Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANAAND ANR. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate Mr. B.S. Patwalia, Advocate for the petitioner.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-9356-2001 (O&M)

Date of decision: 11.09.2026

YOGESH KUMAR

..Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

..Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Present:

Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate

Mr. B.S. Patwalia, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate for respondent No.2.

SUDEEPTI SHARMA

, J. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent-college to confirm the petitioner as lecturer in Civil Engineering in view of Bye Law 11 of the Bye Laws of the college on completion of 3 years of service with all consequential benefits.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that nothing survives in the present writ petition since the relief sought is redressed.

3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

4. Dismissed as infructuous. SAHIL 2026.09.11 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CWP-9356-2001 (O&M)

5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. 11.09.2026

(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) SAHIL

JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAHIL 2026.09.11 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead