Punjab and Haryana High Court

COCP/3592/2026 of LAKHWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS Vs JASPREET TALWAR, IAS on 11 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 101 COCP-3592-2026 Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 Lakhwinder Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus Jaspreet Talwar, IAS ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Singh, AAG,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

COCP-3592-2026

Date of Decision: 11.09.2026

Lakhwinder Singh and others

...Petitioners

Versus

Jaspreet Talwar, IAS

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI

Present:-

Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Sandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab.

*****

VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This petition has been filed for initiating proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for alleged wilful disobedience and non-compliance of order dated 17.02.2026 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Writ Court in CWP-4746-2026, titled as ‘Lakhwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others’.

2. Upon advance copy of the petition having been furnished, learned State counsel had put in appearance on behalf of the respondent and sought time to file compliance affidavit.

3. On resumed hearing today, learned State counsel submits that compliance affidavit dated 07.09.2026, of Ashok Kumar, Joint Director- cum-HOD, Department of Planning, Directorate of Statistics, has been filed in the Registry and appended therewith is speaking order dated 02.09.2026 (Annexure R-1), purported to have been passed in compliance of the HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.11 19:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

COCP-3592-2026

aforesaid order dated 17.02.2026 (Annexure P-1). The same is taken on record. A copy thereof stands furnished to learned counsel opposite.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since substantial compliance has been made by passing a speaking order dated 02.09.2026 (Annexure R-1), the grievance of the petitioners does not survive. He, thus, prays that the present petition be disposed of as not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the speaking order dated 02.09.2026 (Annexure R-1), in accordance with law.

5. Disposed of as not pressed with liberty aforesaid.

6. Rule stands discharged. ( VIKAS SURI ) September 11, 2026 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.11 19:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead