Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/15779/2025 of KRISHAN GOPAL AGGARWAL Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANATHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANATHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANATHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA KRISHAN GOPAL AGGARWALKRISHAN GOPAL AGGARWALKRISHAN GOPAL AGGARWALKRISHAN GOPAL AGGARWAL ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERSASSISTANT
IN
IN
IN
IN T
KRISHAN GO
KRISHAN GO
KRISHAN GO
KRISHAN GO
ASSISTANT
ASSISTANT
ASSISTANT
ASSISTANT
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM: HO
HO
HO
HO
Present :
M
M
M
M
M
M
for
**
DEEPAK SIB
DEEPAK SIB
DEEPAK SIB
DEEPAK SIB
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Le also be entitled this Court date Union of India
2. In terms of Jyoti notice dated 2 Income Tax Ac
11.09 11.09 11.09 11.09.2026 .2026 .2026 .2026 Vandana yadav
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH
CW CW CW CW Da Da Da Da
OPAL AGGARWAL OPAL AGGARWAL OPAL AGGARWAL OPAL AGGARWAL
VERSUS VERSUS VERSUS VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INCOM COMMISSIONER OF INCOM COMMISSIONER OF INCOM COMMISSIONER OF INCOM
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEP DEEP DEEP DEEP ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNI ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNI ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNI ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNI Mr. Vishav Bharti Gupta, Advocat
s. Ubhai Bharti Gupta, Advocate
s. Mamta Gupta, Advocate, for t
r. Varun Issar, Sr. Standing Coun
s. Pridhi Sandhu, Advocate and
s. Nikita Garg, Jr. Standing Coun r the respondents-Income Tax D *** BAL AL BAL AL, J. , J. , J. , J.(O (O (O (Oral ral ral ral) earned counsel for the parties a d to the same relief as has been ed 10.09.2026 passed in CWP- a and others. n the light of the above consen i Sareen’s case (supra), resulting 29.03.2025 issued to the petitio ct, 1961 alongwith consequential
Whether speaking/reasoned. : Ye Whether Reportable. : Ye AB AND HARYANA AB AND HARYANA AB AND HARYANA AB AND HARYANA H WP WP WP WP-15779 15779 15779 15779-2025
ate of Decision : ate of Decision : ate of Decision : ate of Decision : 11.09.
11.09.
11.09. 11.09.2026
...PETITIONER ...PETITIONER ...PETITIONER ...PETITIONER ME TAX AND OTHERS ME TAX AND OTHERS ME TAX AND OTHERS ME TAX AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS ...RESPONDENTS ...RESPONDENTS ...RESPONDENTS PAK SIBAL PAK SIBAL PAK SIBAL PAK SIBAL ISH BINDLISH ISH BINDLISH ISH BINDLISH ISH BINDLISH te e and the petitioner. nsel with
nsel, epartment.
agree that the petitioner would n granted through a judgment of -15791-2024 – Jyoti Sareen vs. nsus, the petition is allowed in g in quashing of the impugned oner under Section 148 of the l proceedings, if any. (DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE (SUNISH BINDLISH) (SUNISH BINDLISH) (SUNISH BINDLISH) (SUNISH BINDLISH)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE es/No es/No
d f . n d e VANDANA YADAV 2026.09.13 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document