Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/29539/2026 of HIRA SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 CWP-29539-2026 Date of decision : 11.09.2026 Hira Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Raghav Ghulati, Advocate for the petitioner. NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral) 1. The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CWP-29539-2026
Date of decision : 11.09.2026
Hira Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Present:
Mr. Raghav Ghulati, Advocate for the petitioner.
NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the impugned transfer/posting order dated 12.08.2026 (Annexure P-3), qua the petitioner, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Amritsar to SSOC, SAS Nagar which is in violation of the provisions of Section 32(3) of the Punjab Police Act, 2007. Further, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue at his present place of posting at Amritsar.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against his transfer order dated 12.08.2026, the petitioner has also submitted representation dated 20.08.2026 (Annexure P-4) to the respondents which is still pending consideration. He further submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if appropriate directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide the said representation, by passing a speaking order, in a time bound manner.
3. Notice of motion. VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.09.11 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CWP-29539-2026
4. Mr. Rohit Ahuja, D.A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State. He has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case.
6. Without going into the merits of the case at this stage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide representation dated 20.08.2026 (Annexure P-4) submitted by the petitioner expeditiously, by passing a speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, preferably within a period of 01 month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereon shall be conveyed to the petitioner.
(NAMIT KUMAR) 11.09.2026
JUDGE kothiyal Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.09.11 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document