Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/8514/2025 of TANIKA GARG Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 135 CWP-8514-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:-28.03.2025 Tanika Garg ....Petitioner Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (3), Patiala & ors. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Vishav
CWP-8514-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CWP-8514-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-28.03.2025
Tanika Garg
....Petitioner
Vs.
Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (3), Patiala & ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present:
Mr. Vishav Bharti Gupta, Advocate
for the petitioner
Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Sr. Standing counsel (Through VC)
with Ms. Muskan Gupta, Advocate
for the respondent-department.
***
SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Challenge in the present petition is to notice dated 27.03.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act 1961”); impugned assessment order dated 07.03.2025 issued under Section 147 of the Act, 1961, demand notice and penalty show cause notice dated 07.03.2025 and all consequential actions, for AY 2022-2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered by the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the cases of Jatinder Singh Bhangu vs. Union of India and others, passed in CWP No. 15745-2024 and connected matter, decided on 19.07.2024 and Jasjit Singh vs. Union of India and others (CWP No. 21509-2023 and other connected matters), decided on 29.07.2024 .
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same.
2025.04.03 15:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-8514-2025
4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the whole records of the case.
5. The petitioner has challenged the notice dated 27.03.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Act, 1961; impugned assessment order dated 07.03.2025 issued under Section 147 of the Act, 1961, demand notice and penalty show cause notice dated 07.03.2025 and all consequential actions, for AY 2022-2023, on the ground that the Issuing Authority had no jurisdiction to issue the same, in view of the circular/notification dated 29.03.2022 of the CBDT, wherein, it has been specifically enumerated that the NFAC has exclusive power to issue the notice under Section 148 of the Act, 1961.
6. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Jatinder Singh Bhangu’s case (supra) and Jasjit Singh’s case (supra), allowed the writ petitions on the same issue, as raised in the present writ petition, by granting liberty to the revenue to follow the procedure as laid down under the Act, 1961 and proceed accordingly, if so advised.
7. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of, in terms of Jatinder Singh Bhangu’s case (supra), decided on 19.07.2024 and Jasjit Singh’s case (supra), decided on 29.07.2024
8. All the pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ARUN PALLI) (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE JUDGE 28.03.2025
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Gaurav Arora 2025.04.03 15:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document