Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/29627/2026 of VARINDER SINGH EX CONSTABLE NO 3765 AMRITSAR CITY Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-29627 of 2026 Date of decision: 11.09.2026 Varinder Singh ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: - Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-29627 of 2026
Date of decision: 11.09.2026
Varinder Singh
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Present: -
Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Rohit Ahuja, DAG, Punjab.
NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 03.10.2025 (Annexure P-4), passed by respondent No.3 to the extent vide which the appeal filed by the petitioner challenging the order of dismissal dated 24.02.2025 (Annexure P-2), passed by respondent No.4 by invoking Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution of India has been kept pending till final decision of the case by trial Court in FIR No.17 dated 24.02.2025 registered under Sections 7, 7-A of the Prevention of Corruption Act and under Section 61(2) of the BNS, 2023 at Police Station C-Division, District Amritsar City.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against the order dated 24.02.2025 (Annexure P-2), whereby petitioner has been dismissed from service, petitioner has filed a statutory appeal RAVINDER SINGH 2026.09.11 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
(Annexure P-3), which has not been disposed of on merits and in the order dated 03.10.2025 (Annexure P-4) only it has been stated that the same has been kept pending till the final orders in aforesaid case FIR No.17 dated 24.02.2025.
3. Learned State counsel submits that the statutory appeal (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner shall be considered and disposed of by respondent No.3 within a period of three months from today, by passing a well-reasoned speaking order after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.
4. Disposed of in above terms. (NAMIT KUMAR) 11.09.2026 JUDGE R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2026.09.11 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh