Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/11105/2026 of HARPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-11105-2026 Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 HARDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Dolli Sharma, Advocate, and Mr. Sahil

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-11105-2026

Date of Decision: 11.09.2026

HARDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER

......... Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

..... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present :

Mr. Dolli Sharma, Advocate, and

Mr. Sahil Gupta, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL

, J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Articles 226/2327 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of directions to official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners, who apprehend threat to their life at the hands of respondents No.4 to 8 and not to harass or interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in live-in-relationship and are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 07.09.2026 (Annexure P-3) was also made to respondent No.2- Commissioner of Police, District Jalandhar, Punjab, for protection of their lives and liberty but in vain. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.09.11 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Page 1 of 2

3. Notice of motion.

4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of Official respondents.

5. In view of above, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents.

6. Pending application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 11.09.2026 S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.09.11 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead