Punjab and Haryana High Court
COCP/2932/2023 of YOGESH KUMAR Vs AJOY KUMAR SINHA AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113+257 COCP-2932-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.09.2024 YOGESH KUMAR ....Petitioner(s) Versus AJOY KUMAR SINHA AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present : Mr. Paramjit Pande, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Gogna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
113+257
COCP-2932-2023 (O&M)
Date of decision: 23.09.2024
YOGESH KUMAR
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
AJOY KUMAR SINHA AND OTHERS
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present :
Mr. Paramjit Pande, Advocate for
Mr. Gaurav Gogna Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Rohit Bansal, Sr. D.A.G. Punjab.
*****
HARKESH MANUJA. J. (Oral)
CM-13823-CII-2024
The present application has been filed under Section 151 CPC to place on record the counter-affidavit of the petitioner.
For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. Counter- affidavit of the petitioner is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Office to tag the same at appropriate place.
COCP-2932-2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of present petition filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, contempt proceedings are sought to be initiated against the respondents towards alleged willful non-compliance of order dated 04.08.2023 passed by this Court in CWP-6090-2014.
2. Learned counsel representing the respondents on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined on the post of Assistant Treasurer, in the Office of Department of Finance and Accounts, Government of Punjab, however, the SANDAL SHARMA 2024.09.26 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
COCP-2932-2023 (O&M) -2- admissible benefits shall be released to him within a period of six weeks from the date on completion of his probation period.
3. In view of the aforesaid undertaking, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition.
4. Dismissed as not pressed.
5. Rule stands discharged.
6. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application (HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE 23.09.2024 S.Sharma(syr) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/ No SANDAL SHARMA 2024.09.26 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment