Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/11035/2026 of SADDAMIN AND ANOTHER Vs UT OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 111 CRWP-11035-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 SADDAMIN AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Gaurav, Advocate for the
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT
CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: 11.09.2026
SADDAMIN AND ANOTHER
... PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:
Mr. Gaurav, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Ganesh Kumar Sharma, Addl. P.P. U.T. Chandigarh.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondents No. 2 and 3 to ensure protection of the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and not to interfere in the matrimonial life of the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and have performed marriage on 05.09.2026. Copy of marriage certificate is (Annexure P-3). Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 07.09.2025 (Annexure P-6) was also made to respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Union Territory, Chandigarh for protection of their lives and liberty but in vain. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No. 2 to look into their representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.09.11 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Page 1 of 2
3. Notice of motion to official respondents.
4. Mr. Ganesh Kumar Sharma, Addl. P.P. U.T. Chandigarh accepts notice on behalf of official respondents.
5. In view of above, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.
6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 11.09.2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.09.11 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…