Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/10998/2026 of RAVEENA BAWA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
1111 111144441111 IIIINNNN TTTTHHHHEEEE HHHHIIIIGGGGHHHH CCCCOOOOUUUURRRRTTTT OOOOFFFF PPPPUUUUNNNNJJJJAAAABBBB AAAANNNNDDDD HHHHAAAARRRRYYYYAAAANNNNAAAA AAAATTTT CCCCHHHHAAAANNNNDDDDIIIIGGGGAAAARRRRHHHH CCCCRRRRWWWWPPPP----11110000999999998888----2222000022226666
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-10998-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 11.09.2026
RAVEENA BAWA AND ANOTHER
... PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:-
Mr. A.K.Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, who are averse to their live in relationship.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 has been in live in relationship with petitioner No.2. Respondents No.4 to 8 have been extending threats of dire consequences to the petitioners as they are averse to their live in relationship. While drawing the attention of this Court to Annexure P-3 dated 06.09.2026, learned counsel has submitted that the matter was reported to Superintendent of Police, Ambala seeking his help, however, it had been in vain. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Ambala to look into the aforesaid representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. JANKI BHATT 2026.09.11 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Page 1 of 2
3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only.
4. On asking of the Court, Mr. Vishal Kashyap, Sr. DAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
5. In view of the above, without commenting upon the status of live in relationship of the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Ambala to look into the aforesaid representation qua the alleged threat perception and take necessary steps, as may be required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.
(H.S.GREWAL) 11.09.2026
JUDGE Janki Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2026.09.11 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…