Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/1701/2025 of ANKUR NARULA MINISTRY SOCIETY Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 138 CWP-1701-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:-22.01.2025 Ankur Narula Ministry Society ....Petitioner Vs. Union of India & ors. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Gunjeet Singh
CWP-1701-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CWP-1701-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-22.01.2025
Ankur Narula Ministry Society
....Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India & ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present:
Mr. Gunjeet Singh Syal, Advocate
for the petitioner
Mr. Varun Issar, Sr. Standing counsel
for the respondent-Union of India.
***
SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Challenge in the instant writ petition is to notice dated 11.03.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act 1961’) and conseuqential proceedings, for AY 2017-2018.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered by the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the cases of Jatinder Singh Bhangu vs. Union of India and others, passed in CWP No. 15745-2024 and connected matter, decided on 19.07.2024 and Jasjit Singh vs. Union of India and others (CWP No. 21509-2023 and other connected matters), decided on 29.07.2024 .
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same.
4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
2025.01.24 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-1701-2025
whole records of the case.
5. The petitioner has challenged the notice dated 11.03.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Act, 1961 and conseuqential proceedings, for AY 2017-2018, on the ground that the Issuing Authority had no jurisdiction to issue the same, in view of the circular/notification dated 29.03.2022 of the CBDT, wherein, it has been specifically enumerated that the NFAC has exclusive power to issue the notice under Section 148 of the Act, 1961.
6. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Jatinder Singh Bhangu’s case (supra) and Jasjit Singh’s case (supra), allowed the writ petitions on the same issue, as raised in the present writ petition, by granting liberty to the revenue to follow the procedure as laid down under the Act, 1961 and proceed accordingly, if so advised.
7. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of, in terms of Jatinder Singh Bhangu’s case (supra), decided on 19.07.2024 and Jasjit Singh’s case (supra), decided on 29.07.2024
8. All the pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ARUN PALLI) (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE JUDGE 22.01.2025
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Gaurav Arora 2025.01.24 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document