Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/25678/2026 of KULDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER on 11 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 230 KULDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) 1. under Sections Station Sector 32 proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 29.04.2026. 2.
IN
KULDEEP
STATE OF
CORAM: H
Present:
Shalini Sing
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. under Section Station Sect proceedings 29.04.2026.
2. learned trial regard to com
3. learned Chie Investigating
THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIGA
SINGH AND ANOTHER VERSUS
HARYANA AND ANOTHER
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Deep Singh Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kshitij Bharti, AAG, Haryan
Mr. Vinod Pundir, Advocate for respondent No.2.
*** gh Nagpal, J. (Oral) Petitioners seek quashing of ns 316(2) and 318(4) of Bharati tor 32-33, District Karnal, H arising therefrom, on the On 26.05.2026, this Court direc Court/Illaqa Magistrate for rec mpromise dated 29.04.2026. In compliance of the aforesaid ef Judicial Magistrate, Karnal g Officer HC Manoj Kumar
NJAB AND HARYANA ARH CRM-M-25678-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 11.09.2026
…PETITIONERS R ...RESPONDENTS LINI SINGH NAGPAL e na. FIR No.669 dated 06.12.2024 iya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Police Haryana and all consequential basis of compromise dated cted the parties to appear before cording of their statements with d order, parties appeared before on 08.06.2026. Statement of was recorded on 12.06.2026.
e l d e h e f . JYOTI
Learned Ch recording sa compromise has been sub p hief Judicial Magistrate, Karn atisfaction that all the partie without any influence or coerc mitted: “1. In the present FIR, there ar Singh Saini and Gulab Singh Sa
2. There is only one complainan
3. Yes all the accused and comp compromise and signed the sa Singh appeared through VC and
4. No affected person (accused not arrayed as party in the q Court.
5. No accused is declared pro such proceedings against them adjudication.
6. According to the stateme complainant, the compromise is any coercion or undue influence
7. No aspect except abovesai present case.”
nal, has submitted her report es have entered into a valid cion. Point-wise report as under re two accused namely Kuldeep aini. nt namely Dinesh Chand Mittal. plainant/victims are party to the ame, however accused Kuldeep d identified by his counsel. d or complainant) is left out or quashing petition before High oclaimed offender/person or no have been initiated or pending ents of accused persons and s genuine, voluntary and without e. id aspects are relevant to the t d r p e p r h o g d t e JYOTI
4. factum of c continuation
5. Judgment of and another “Gian Singh petition is all
6. of Bharatiya Karnal, Hary quashed qua
7. 11.09.2026 Jyoti-V
Learned State counsel has not r compromise. Since the matter of the criminal proceedings wou Following principles of law l this Court in “Kulwinder Singh ” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 h Versus State of Punjab and o lowed. FIR No.669 dated 06.12.2024 un a Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police yana and all consequential proc the petitioner, on the basis of co Pending applications, if any, stan
Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable :
raised any dispute regarding the has been amicably resolved, uld be an exercise in futility. laid down by the Full Bench h and others Vs. State of Punjab 2 and Hon’ble Supreme Court in others”(2012) 10 SCC 303, the nder Sections 316(2) and 318(4) Station Sector 32-33, District ceedings arising therefrom, are ompromise dated 29.04.2026. nd disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No e , h b n e ) t e
) JYOTI