Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/52598/2025 of AJAY KUMAR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 121 CRM-M-52598-2025 AJAY KUMAR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS DATE OF DECISION: 11.09.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING: 11.09.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
121
CRM-M-52598-2025
AJAY KUMAR
.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENTS
DATE OF DECISION: 11.09.2026
DATE OF UPLOADING: 11.09.2026
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: -
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Rahul Arora, Advocate for respondents No.7 & 9.
Mr. Anirudh Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.11.
…..
SUMEET GOEL
, J (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. During the course of hearing, it has been brought to the notice of the Court that challan against 5 accused was presented by the police on 12.09.2025 and charges have also been framed by the concerned Court on 20.12.2025.
2. In view of the above, no good ground is made out for interference by this Court in terms of the prayer made in the petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
3. Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitoner to avail alternative remedy(s) as enunciated in law.
4. Ordered accordingly.
(SUMEET GOEL) 11.09.2026
JUDGE Jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2026.09.11 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document