CWP/29610/2026 of SALO Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026

1. Constitutio in the natu service of Governmen service ren 11.01.2007 Country P service in t by the Hon consequent actual paym decide her reasoned a respondent applicable

GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H

CWP Date

Versus

aryana and others

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NID Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate

UPTA, J. (ORAL) Present writ petition unde on of India has been filed by the ure of Mandamus directing the petitioner on the post of Data nt service rendered from 11.0 ndered in the Department of Sc 7 to 30.08.2011 and thereafter in Planning, Haryana from 19.10. terms of the applicable Regulariz n’ble Supreme Court as well a tial benefits and interest @ 18% ment; and further, directing th representation dated 27.04.2026 and speaking order within a ts be also directed to grant the p to regular Data Entry Operator

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH P-29610-2026 e of Decision: 11.09.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents DHI GUPTA e for the petitioner. er Articles 226/227 of the petitioner for issuance of a writ e respondents to regularize the Entry Operator by treating her 1.2007 onwards including the chool Education, Haryana from n the Directorate of Town and .2011 onwards, as continuous zation Policy, the law laid down as by this Court along with all % per annum from due date till he respondents to consider and 6 (Annexure P-7) by passing a time bound period; and the petitioner the regular pay scale r(s) holding identical or similar posts under consequent allowance, admissible date the am

2. initially, th Operator v of School Departmen through H (Annexure Haryana, a then the pe continuous is further s was acknow to 30.08.20 entitled for Hon’ble Ap online SC squarely co 12.05.2026 a bunch of ‘Deepak S

r the doctrine of “Equal Pay for tial benefits including pay fixatio continuity of service, notional service benefits, along with inte mounts became due till the date o Learned counsel for the peti he petitioner was engaged throu vide letter dated 11.01.2007 (An Education, Haryana and disch nt till 30.08.2011. Thereafter, the HARTRON on the same post P-2) in the Directorate of T against sanctioned post on the b etitioner is working with the res sly and to the satisfaction of resp submitted that vide letter dated wledged that the past service of 011 shall be treated as continu r regularization of her service in pex Court in Jaggo vs. Union o 3826. It is also submitted that overed by the ratio of a recent 6 (Annexure P-8) passed by a co- f writ petitions having lead case Singh and others vs. State of r Equal Work” together with all on, annual increments, dearness seniority, arrears and all other erest @ 6% per annum from the of actual payment. itioner inter alia submits that ugh HARTRON as Data Entry nnexure P-1) in the Department harged her duties in the said e petitioner was again engaged vide letter dated 19.10.2011 Town and Country Planning, basis of past experience. Since spondent-Department regularly, pondent-Department till date. It d 09.03.2017 (Annexure P-5) it the petitioner w.e.f. 11.01.2007 uous. As such, the petitioner is n view of law laid down by the of India and others, 2024 SCC t case of the petitioner is also t judgment of this Court dated -ordinate Bench of this Court in No. CWP-1770-2026, titled as Haryana and others’. In this regard, the (Annexure response ha

3. petitioner w disposed o the represe manner, wh Jaggo’s ca Singh’s ca

4.

5. behalf of re the aforesa accepted. H service ten has rendere regularizati

6. expressing petitioner direction forthwith (Annexure with law, w e petitioner has also moved a re P-7) before the respondent upon as been received, so far. Learned counsel for the p would be satisfied at this stage i f with a direction to the respon entation dated 27.04.2026 (Ann hile keeping in mind judgment o ase (supra) as well as judgme ase (supra). Notice of motion. Mr. Aakash Singla, Addl. A. espondent-State and submits tha aid limited prayer of learned However, it is submitted by l nure of the petitioner needs to be ed continuous and satisfactory s ion. After hearing learned counse any opinion on the merits in the present petition, the s to the respondents/Competen consider and decide the repr P-7) by passing a speaking and within a period of 06 months epresentation dated 27.04.2026 n the respondents. However, no petitioner submits that the if the present petition may be ndents to consider and decide nexure P-7) in a time bound of the Hon’ble Apex Court in ent of this Court in Deepak G., Haryana, accepts notice on at he has ‘no objection’ in case, counsel for the petitioner is learned State counsel that the e ascertained as to whether she service to make her eligible for el for the parties and without of the claim raised by the ame is disposed of with a nt Authority, concerned, to resentation dated 27.04.2026 reasoned order, in accordance from the date of receipt of a certified co by the Hon of this Cou

7. 11.09.2026 rishu

opy of this order, while keeping n’ble Apex Court in Jaggo’s cas urt in Deepak Singh’s case (supr Pending application(s) if any a

Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable in mind the judgment passed se (supra) as well as judgment ra). also stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No