CRA-S/2206/2026 of KRISHAN THAKUR Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER on 11 September 2026

1. The prese 25.05.202 dismissed in a crimi hereinund FIR

2. The abov application with Krish other Afte from her a of Novem Market an her friends THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGA

CR Dat N THAKUR

Versus OF HARYANA AND ANOTHE : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE Mr. Sheb Khan, Advocate for Mr. Vijay Kumar, A.A.G., H

**** H KUMARI H KUMARI H KUMARI H KUMARI, J. (oral) ent appeal has been filed agai 6 whereby, his application for by learned Additional Sessions inal case arising out of First er:-

No. Dated Sections

19.11.2024 506 of IP POCSO, SC/ST Ac ve noted criminal case had be n moved by the complainant/vic han Thakur through Instagram er some days, Krishan Thakur to and they started talking with eac mber 2023, he invited her to m nd she went there to meet him. A s's hotel was nearby and they sh

JAB AND HARYANA ARH RA-S-2206 of 2026 (O&M) te of decision: 11.09.2026

…. Appellant ER …. Respondents r the appellant. Haryana. inst the impugned order dated grant of regular bail had been Judge, Special Court, Faridabad Information Report as detailed Police Station C and 6 of 3(2)(V) of ct. Old Faridabad een registered on the basis of ctim alleging that she befriended m and started talking with each ook her mother's mobile number ch other on phone. In the month meet him at Shri Shyam Baba After reaching there, he told that hould go there. On believing his d n d f d h r h a t s JYOTI

words, she forcibly e obscene p would ma family me alleged in called her photos/vid persons w relations/p to her pare

3. After regi depicting medico-leg also got appellant Realme w certificate SC/ST Ac the appella of the vic Statement challan wa

4. Learned c in custody CRA-S-2206 of 2026 (O&M e went to hotel, where he mixed established physical relations w photos/videos and said that if sh ake viral the photos/videos and embers. Due to threat and insult ncident to anyone. In the month r in the same hotel by givin deo and committed rape with h were making calls and messa physical exploitation and due to w ents. istration of this case, investiga the place of occurrence was gally examined. Her statement recorded. The appellant was was also medico-legally exam was got recovered from the ap of the victim was got verified an ct was added. The mobile phone ant deposited in DITAC Gurugr ctim was also obtained from of witnesses were recorded. Af as presented against the appellan counsel for the appellant submit y since 20.11.2024, since the day

M) -2- something in her cold drink and with her and also clicked her he disclosed this to anyone, he d also given threat to kill her t, she did not disclose about the h of December 2023, he again ng threat to viral her obscene her. Krishan Thakur and other ages for establishing physical which, she disclosed all incident ation was conducted. Site plan prepared. The victim was got under Section 183 BNSS was arrested on 20.11.2024. The mined. One mobile phone make ppellant. On 04.12.2024, caste nd thereafter, Section 3(2)(V) of e which was got recovered from ram. The date of birth certificate the school where she studied. fter completion of investigation, nt. ted that the present appellant is y of his arrest. The statement of d r e r e n e r l t n t s e e e f m e . , s f JYOTI

the victim dismissed submits th bail on tho

5. Learned S 05.08.202 today, has BNSS as w specificall submitted assault wit threatened Therefore,

6. As per the involved i CRA-S-2206 of 2026 (O&M m had already been recorded. L the bail of the appellant for hat the appellant is also involved ose cases. State counsel while relying upon 6 and the compliance report d s submitted that the victim in h well as her statement recorded b ly corroborated the allegations that the present appellant has co th the victim and click her obsce d her he would make those p , he is not entitled for grant of re e compliance report dated 08.09 n three other cases, detail of whi

1. FIR No.157 dated Sections 61-4-20 of H Faridabad.

2. FIR No.163 dated Sections 61-4-20 of H Faridabad.

3. FIR No.242 dated Sections 25-54-59 of Faridabad.

M) -3- Learned trial Court erroneously grant of regular bail. He also in three other cases but he is on the previous status report dated dated 08.09.2026 filed in Court her statement under Section 183 efore the learned trial Court had against the appellant. It is also ommitted the penetrative sexual ene photographs and videos and photographs and videos viral. egular bail. 9.2026, the present appellant is ich is as under:- 17.04.2024 registered under H.A. Act, Police Station Old 25.04.2024 registered under H.A. Act, Police Station Old 06.07.2024 registered under Arms Act, Police Station Old y o n d t d o l d . s r d r d r d JYOTI

7. The appel prosecutio already be Gurugram recorded. appellant w influenced likely to t case, this of interim

8. According be release satisfactio following CRA-S-2206 of 2026 (O&M llant is on bail in those case an on evidence. In the present cas een handed over to the Police m is still awaited. The statement The remaining prosecution witne who are official witnesses and t d by the present appellant. The c take time. Therefore, without co Court is of the view that the ap pre-arrest bail. gly, the instant appeal is allowed ed on regular bail on furnish n of the learned trial Court/D conditions:-

(i) The appellant shall not permission of the trial C passport in the trial Cou

(ii) The appellant will not t the trial.

(iii) The appellant will not prosecution witnesses.

(iv) The appellant will app each and every date fix specific order of Court.

(v) The appellant shall not the offence of which, h commission of which h

(vi) The appellant shall not induce, threaten or prom

M) -4- nd the cases are at the stage of se, mobile of the appellant had e and the report from DITAC, of the victim had already been esses to be examined against the there is no chance of their being ompletion of trial against him is ommenting on the merits of the ppellant deserves the concession d, and the appellant is ordered to hing bail/surety bonds to the Duty Magistrate, subject to the t leave the country without prior Court and shall deposit the ourt. tamper with the evidence during t pressurize/ intimidate the pear before the trial Court on xed, unless is exempted by a t. t commit an offence similar to he is an accused, or for he is suspected of. t directly or indirectly coerce, omise to any person acquainted f d , n e g s e n o e e g JYOTI

It is mad conditions granted to

10. In view o limited for as an opi independe

11. Pending ap

11.09.202 11.09.202 11.09.202 11.09.202 Jyoti-IV

CRA-S-2206 of 2026 (O&M with the facts of the cas from disclosing such fa officer or tamper with t

(vii) The appellant shall not liberty.

(viii) The appellant shall furn number to the Trial Co change the same till the case for any reason, the of the aforesaid, the sam intimation to the learne for the same.

(ix) The trial Court/Duty M condition, as deemed ap appellant. de clear that in case there is s, the State shall be at liberty the appellant by this order. of the above, it is clarified that th r the purpose of present proceedi inion on the merits of the cas ently of the aforesaid observation pplication, if any, also stands dis

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Whether reportable :

M) -5- ase so as to dissuade him/her facts to the Court or to any police the evidence in any manner. ot in any manner misuse his rnish his address and mobile ourt forthwith and shall not he conclusion of the trial and in he appellant seeks to change any ame shall be done only with prior ed Trial Court, stating the reason Magistrate may impose any other appropriate while releasing the s any breach of the aforesaid to seek cancellation of bail as he observations made herein are ings and would not be construed se and the trial would proceed ns. sposed of.

(RAMESH KUMARI

RAMESH KUMARI) ) ) )

JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No e r n r d s e d d

JYOTI