Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/27428/2026 of RAKESH KUMAR Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 107 Rakesh Kumar State of Haryana and CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion in accordance with the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN
Rakesh K
State of H
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GU
appropriat Mandamu for promo (Annexure Supreme C versus Ch Telangana judgment Supreme C Commissi the petitio responden CWP-27428-2026 (O & M) N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGA
CWP No.27428
Date of decision Kumar Versus Haryana and another :- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NID Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advo for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG, UPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ p te writ, order or direction, particu s, directing the respondents to cons otion in accordance with the se e P-5), in the light of the judg Court in “Registrar, Jawaharlal Ne hairman and Managing Director, a Limited”, reported as 2019 (1 dated 15.10.2025 (Annexure P Court in “C.S. Kandwal and Oth ion (UGC) and Others” At the outset, learned counsel oner would be satisfied, at this sta nts to consider and decide the re
JAB AND HARYANA ARH of 2026 (O & M) :-11.09.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HI GUPTA ocate , Haryana. petition is for issuance of an ularly a writ in the nature of sider the claim of the petitioner eniority list dated 01.07.2017 gment passed by the Hon’ble Nehru Technological University Transmission Corporation of
13) SCC 620, as well as the P-6) passed by the Hon’ble hers versus University Grants for the petitioner submits that age, if a direction is issued to epresentations dated 16.4.2026 VIJAY ASIJA 2026.09.11 17.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
(Annexure Hon’ble S manner, w behalf of r aforesaid l raised by t writ petitio decide the keeping in Kandwal’s accordanc receipt of on the en competent the applica
September Vijay Asij
Whether sp Whether Re
CWP-27428-2026 (O & M) es P-7 and P-8) while keeping in vi Supreme Court in C.S. Kandwal’s which are stated to be pending consi Notice of motion. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG respondents-State and submits that limited prayer of learned counsel fo Heard. Without expressing any opinio the petitioner, and in view of the li on is disposed of with a direction e representations dated 16.4.2026 ( n view the judgment passed by the H s case (supra), by passing a spe e with law, within a period of f a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court ntitlement of the petitioner to t t authority shall take an independe able rules and regulations. Pending application(s), if any, r 11, 2026
a
peaking/reasoned Yes / No eportable Yes / No iew the judgment passed by the case (supra), in a time bound ideration. G, Haryana accepts notice on he has no objection in case the or the petitioner is accepted. on on the merits of the claim imited relief sought, the present to respondents to consider and (Annexures P-7 and P-8) while Hon’ble Supreme Court in C.S. eaking and reasoned order, in four months from the date of has not expressed any opinion the claimed benefit, and the ent decision in accordance with shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.09.11 17.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document