CWP/29467/2026 of BIJENDER KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026

1. appropria Mandamu petitioner all conseq 18.06.201 view of t the Hon’b “Madan S

2. petitioner basis aga period fro CWP-29467-2026 (O & M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGA

CWP No.29467

Date of decision Kumar and others Versus Haryana and others M:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE N

Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ p ate writ, order or direction, partic us, directing the respondents to r rs on the respective posts being quential benefits, in terms of th 14 (Annexure P-12) issued by t the judgment dated 16.04.2026 ble Supreme Court in Civil Ap Singh and others vs. State of Ha It is, inter alia, submitted rs that the eleven petitioners w ainst Group-D posts of Assistan om 2006 to 2009, as per the deta

JAB AND HARYANA ARH 7 of 2026 (O & M) n :-11.09.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA e petition is for issuance of an cularly a writ in the nature of regularize the services of the manned by them, along with he Policy/Notification dated the State of Haryana and in (Annexure P-13) passed by ppeal No.1996 of 2024 titled aryana and others”. by learned counsel for the were appointed on monthly nt Pump Operator during the ails given in para 2 at page 10 VIJAY ASIJA

of the w petitioner entitled to passed by and othe submitted designatio The petit Rozgar N Deployme and 2, h respective Learned c sanctione rendered their clai judgment

at this st petition is and decid submitted case (supr

3. CWP-29467-2026 (O & M) writ petition and Annexure P- rs have, thus, rendered more than o consideration for regularizati y the Hon’ble Supreme Court in rs”, reported as 2024 SCC On d that, vide instructions dated 31. on of the post was changed to M tioners were thereafter registe Nigam Limited against Group-D ent Offer Letters, including tho have been placed on record a ely. Similar letters were issued counsel submits that the petitio d vacant posts after following more than 19 years of service. I im for regularization be cons in Jaggo’s case (supra). Learned counsel for the peti tage, the petitioners would be s disposed of with a direction to de the representation dated 13 d by them, while keeping in vie ra). Notice of motion.

8. It is submitted that the n 10 years of service and are on in view of the judgment n “Jaggo vs. Union of India nLine SC 3826. It is further .08.2021 (Annexure P-2), the Multipurpose Health Worker. ered with Haryana Kaushal D posts in the year 2022 and se issued to petitioners No.1 as Annexures P-7 and P-8 to the remaining petitioners. oners were appointed against g due procedure and have It is, accordingly, prayed that sidered in the light of the itioners further submits that, satisfied if the present writ o the respondents to consider 3.08.2026 (Annexure P-15) ew the judgment in Jaggo’s VIJAY ASIJA

4. on behalf the limite stage is a the petitio have rend for regula

5. expressin petition is consider a

15) subm order, in a date of re claim, the judgment (supra), a petitioner

6. Septembe Vijay Asija

Whether spe Whether Rep

CWP-29467-2026 (O & M) Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DA f of the respondents and submit ed prayer made by learned coun accepted. It is, however, submitt oners would require verificatio dered continuous and satisfactory arization. After hearing learned counse ng any opinion on the merits of s disposed of with a direction to and decide the representation dat mitted by the petitioners, by pass accordance with law, within a p eceipt of a certified copy of this e competent authority shall also passed by the Hon’ble Supre as well as the relevant policy/in rs. Pending application(s), if any er 11, 2026

eaking/reasoned Yes / No portable Yes / No

AG, Haryana, accepts notice ts that he has no objection if nsel for the petitioners at this ted that the service tenure of on to ascertain whether they y service so as to be eligible el for the parties and without f the claim, the present writ o the competent authority to ted 13.08.2026 (Annexure P- sing a speaking and reasoned eriod of six months from the order. While considering the o take into consideration the eme Court in Jaggo’s case nstructions applicable to the y, shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA )

JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA