Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/29530/2026 of SANDEEP SHARMA AND ORS Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS on 11 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (119) Sandeep Sharma State of Punjab CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Constitution of India, a prayer is made of issuance of a writ, in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents, juniors, including respondents No.5 to 7, in terms of the
CWP-29530
IN
Sandeep Sh
State of Pun
CORAM:
Present:
KULDEEP
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Constitution mandamus, juniors, incl by the Dep P-12 and P-
2. have made t to responden as on date, mandamus,
3. 0-2026 N THE HIGH COURT OF PU
AT CHANDIG
arma and others
Versus njab and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KU Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate a Mr. Amarjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Pun **** P TIWARI, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition, c n of India, a prayer is made of is directing the respondents, to r luding respondents No.5 to 7, in artment of Finance, Govt. of P 23, respectively. Learned counsel for the petiti the representation/legal notice d nts No.1 to 3. However, the said which propelled them to file upon the respondents concerned Notice of motion.
UNJAB AND HARYANA GARH CWP-29530-2026 Date of Decision : 11.09.2026
…Petitioners
...Respondents ULDEEP TIWARI and njab. cast under Article 226/227 of th ssuance of a writ, in the nature re-fix their pay at par with the n terms of the instructions issue Punjab, vide Annexures P-6, P- ioners submits that the petition dated 25.06.2026 (Annexure P-2 d legal notice has not been decid the instant writ petition, seeki d, to take apt steps.
he of eir ed -7, ners 24), ed, ing MANPREET SINGH 2026.09.12 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
CWP-29530
4. the respond objection, in decided the
5. been made b mandamus u the legal no order, after p
6. months, from
7.
8. its complian
September 1 Manpreet
0-2026 Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Pu dents/State, and waives services. n case, a mandamus is passed u legal notice (supra). In view of the above, since a b by the petitioners, this Court dee upon the competent respondent a otice dated 25.06.2026 (Annex providing adequate opportunity The exercise (supra), shall be c m the date of receipt of certified Disposed of accordingly. Copy of this order be conveyed nce.
11, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
unjab, accepts notice on behalf . He fairly submits that he has upon the authorities concerned, bona fide and innocuous prayer h ems it fit and appropriate to pas amongst the respondents, to deci ure P-24), by passing a speaki of hearing to the petitioners. carried out within a period of thr copy of this order. d to the respondents, forthwith, f
(KULDEEP TIWARI)
JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No f of no to has ss a ide ing ree for MANPREET SINGH 2026.09.12 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment