Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/29529/2026 of SUSHEELA Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 115 CWP-29529-2026 Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 SUSHEELA ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Pankaj Chugh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G.,
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT
CHANDIGARH
CWP-29529-2026
Date of Decision: 11.09.2026
SUSHEELA
... Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY.
****
Present:
Mr. Pankaj Chugh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
****
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has not been granted the benefit of Old Pension Scheme despite the fact that the similarly circumstanced employees have been granted the same vide judgment dated 24.08.2026, Annexure P-16 passed by a Coordinate Bench in CWP-10970-2025 titled as ‘Suresh Kumar Versus State of Haryana and Others’ alongwith a batch of other writ petitions. She has submitted a representation, based on which her claim was recommended by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Gurugram to the Director General of Police, Haryana on 30.10.2023, Annexure P-13. Reminder to the same was submitted on 23.07.2024, Annexure P-14 which was followed by a letter dated 26.09.2024, Annexure P-15, vide which the matter was forwarded by the Director General of Police, Haryana to the Addl. Chief Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Home Department, Chandigarh, but no decision has been taken thereupon. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner. RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.09.11 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-29529-2026
Page 1 of 2
2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made.
3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, within a period of 04 months, in accordance with law, taking note of the submissions made and judgment referred to hereinabove and after granting opportunity of hearing to her, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner.
4. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same shall contain reasons and she shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) SEPTEMBER 11, 2026.
JUDGE Rajender
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.09.11 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…