Punjab and Haryana High Court

CWP/29529/2026 of SUSHEELA Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 115 CWP-29529-2026 Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 SUSHEELA ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Pankaj Chugh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G.,

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT

CHANDIGARH

CWP-29529-2026

Date of Decision: 11.09.2026

SUSHEELA

... Petitioner

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY.

****

Present:

Mr. Pankaj Chugh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

****

AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)

1. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has not been granted the benefit of Old Pension Scheme despite the fact that the similarly circumstanced employees have been granted the same vide judgment dated 24.08.2026, Annexure P-16 passed by a Coordinate Bench in CWP-10970-2025 titled as ‘Suresh Kumar Versus State of Haryana and Others’ alongwith a batch of other writ petitions. She has submitted a representation, based on which her claim was recommended by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Gurugram to the Director General of Police, Haryana on 30.10.2023, Annexure P-13. Reminder to the same was submitted on 23.07.2024, Annexure P-14 which was followed by a letter dated 26.09.2024, Annexure P-15, vide which the matter was forwarded by the Director General of Police, Haryana to the Addl. Chief Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Home Department, Chandigarh, but no decision has been taken thereupon. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner. RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.09.11 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-29529-2026

Page 1 of 2

2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made.

3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, within a period of 04 months, in accordance with law, taking note of the submissions made and judgment referred to hereinabove and after granting opportunity of hearing to her, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner.

4. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same shall contain reasons and she shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) SEPTEMBER 11, 2026.

JUDGE Rajender

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable

: Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.09.11 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead