Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/51577/2026 of JAGJIT KAUR AND ORS. Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 11 September 2026

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (124) CRM-M-51577-2026 Jagjit Kaur and others ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana ……Respondent(s) Decided on : 11.09.2026 Date of uploading: 11.09.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Deepak Arora,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-51577-2026

Jagjit Kaur and others

……Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana

……Respondent(s)

Decided on : 11.09.2026

Date of uploading: 11.09.2026

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Present:

Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

*****

Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral):

1. The substantive prayer made in the instant petition reads thus:

“In view of the submissions made hereinabove, it is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the present petition may kindly be accepted and for reasons as mentioned, this Hon'ble Court may kindly issue appropriate directions to police station City Thanesar District Kurukshetra so as to comply with the appropriate procedure as in the given case the police is unduly victimizing and harassing the petitioners; as on account of the matrimonial dispute of Simranjeet Singh i.e. petitioner no. 2 with his wife i.e. respondent no. 2 Prabhjeet Kaur, daughter of Harmeet Singh, resident of Jyotisar, District Kurukshetra, the local police is unduly calling the petitioners on telephone without even serving any notice under the provisions of section 160 Cr.P.C. (Section 179 BNSS) and in the even case since the petitioners have complained before the local police staff for demanding bribe and even FIR No. 005 dated 03.04.2026 U/s 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, registered at Police Station ACB, Ambala, district State Vigilance & Anti Corruption Bureau, Haryana (Annexure P-1) stands registered NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.11 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.

CRM-M-51577-2026

Page 1 of 2

against the guilty police officials; therefore, the petitioners have serious apprehension that the concerned police staff would unduly implicate them in false case on the said complaint of respondent no. 2 and therefore, the petitioners craves the kind indulgence of this Hon'ble Court to kindly issue necessary directions that in case the petitioners putting appearance before the concerned I.O. i.e. Police Station Jyotisar, District Kurukshetra and written/advance notice be given to them in case any appearance of petitioners required.”

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, at the outset, seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy as enunciated in law.

3. Ordered accordingly.

(SUMEET GOEL) September 11, 2026

JUDGE Naveen

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether Reportable : Yes/No

NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.11 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead