Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/51480/2026 of DINESH SHARMA Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER on 11 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (129) CRM-M-51480-2026 Dinesh Sharma ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and another ……Respondent(s) Decided on : 11.09.2026 Date of uploading: 11.09.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Mudit Johar,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-51480-2026
Dinesh Sharma
……Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and another
……Respondent(s)
Decided on : 11.09.2026
Date of uploading: 11.09.2026
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present:
Mr. Mudit Johar, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab
(on advance copy).
Mr. Manu Sachdeva, Advocate for respondent No.2
(on his own volition).
*****
Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral):
1. The substantive prayer made in the instant petition reads thus:
“It is, therefore, in the backgrounds of aforesaid facts and law it is, most respectfully prayed that:
a) The present petition may kindly be allowed and FIR No. 32 dated 16.03.2026 under sections 281, 106, 324(4) & 324(5) (corresponding section under IPC 279, 304-A, 427 & 427), registered at police station Ghall Khurd, District Ferozepur, Punjab (Annexure P-1) and all further proceedings arising out of the said FIR may kindly be quashed, on the basis of compromise deed dated 16.05.2026 (Annexure P-2).”
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.11 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.
CRM-M-51480-2026
Page 1 of 2
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at the outset, seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy as available in law.
3. Ordered accordingly.
(SUMEET GOEL) September 11, 2026
JUDGE Naveen
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.09.11 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticityi of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh.
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…