Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/29183/2026 of SARVAN SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS on 11 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB SARVAN SINGHSARVAN SINGHSARVAN SINGHSARVAN SINGH UNION OF INDIA AND ORSUNION OF INDIA AND ORSUNION OF INDIA AND ORSUNION OF INDIA AND ORS CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE
IN T
IN T
IN T
IN T
SARVAN SIN
SARVAN SIN
SARVAN SIN
SARVAN SIN
UNION OF IN
UNION OF IN
UNION OF IN
UNION OF IN
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM: HO
HO
HO
HO
Present :
M
M
fo
(T
**
DEEPAK SIB
DEEPAK SIB
DEEPAK SIB
DEEPAK SIB
1. Le also be entitled this Court date Union of India
2. In terms of Jyoti notice dated 2 Income Tax Ac
11.09 11.09 11.09 11.09.2026 .2026 .2026 .2026 Vandana yadav
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH
Page 1 of 3
CW CW CW CW Da Da Da Da
NGH NGH NGH NGH
VERSUS VERSUS VERSUS VERSUS NDIA AND ORS NDIA AND ORS NDIA AND ORS NDIA AND ORS
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEP DEEP DEEP DEEP ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNI ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNI ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNI ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNI Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate, fo Ms. Gauri Neo Rampal, Sr. Standi r the respondents-Income Tax D Through Video Conferencing) *** BAL AL BAL AL, J. , J. , J. , J.(O (O (O (Oral ral ral ral) earned counsel for the parties a d to the same relief as has been ed 10.09.2026 passed in CWP- a and others. n the light of the above consen i Sareen’s case (supra), resulting 24.03.2024 issued to the petitio ct, 1961 alongwith consequential
Whether speaking/reasoned. : Ye Whether Reportable. : Ye
AB AB AB AB AND HARYANA AND HARYANA AND HARYANA AND HARYANA H WP WP WP WP-29183 29183 29183 29183-2026
ate of Decision : ate of Decision : ate of Decision : ate of Decision : 11.09.
11.09.
11.09. 11.09.2026
Page 2 of 3
...PETITIONER ...PETITIONER ...PETITIONER ...PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS ...RESPONDENTS ...RESPONDENTS ...RESPONDENTS PAK SIBAL PAK SIBAL PAK SIBAL PAK SIBAL ISH BINDLISH ISH BINDLISH ISH BINDLISH ISH BINDLISH or the petitioner. ing Counsel Department. agree that the petitioner would n granted through a judgment of -15791-2024 – Jyoti Sareen vs. nsus, the petition is allowed in g in quashing of the impugned oner under Section 148 of the l proceedings, if any.
(DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE (SUNISH BINDLISH) (SUNISH BINDLISH) (SUNISH BINDLISH) (SUNISH BINDLISH)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE es/No es/No
d f . n d e VANDANA YADAV 2026.09.13 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…