Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/23375/2024 of VINAY JINDAL Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER on 11 September 2026
243 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23375-2024 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.09.2026 Vinay Jindal ...Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH
CWP-23375-2024 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-23375-2024 (O&M)
Date of decision : 11.09.2026
Vinay Jindal
...Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH BINDLISH
Present:
Mr.Dushyant Nayak, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Varun Issar, Senior Standing Counsel
for the respondent(s)-revenue.
DEEPAK SIBAL, J.(Oral)
1. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the petitioner would also be entitled to the same relief as has been granted through a judgment of this Court dated 10.09.2026 passed in CWP-15791-2024- Jyoti Sareen vs. Union of India and others.
2. In the light of the above consensus, the petition is allowed in terms of Jyoti Sareen’s case (supra), resulting in quashing of the impugned notice dated 28.03.2024 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 alongwith consequential proceedings, if any. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (SUNISH BINDLISH) JUDGE 11.09.2026 Harish Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned: Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No
HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.12 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…