Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/3565/2025 of BALRAJ SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 130 CWP-3565-2025 Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 Balraj Singh ....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH BINDLISH Present: Mr. Puneet Kansal, Advocate for
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
130
CWP-3565-2025
Date of Decision: 10.09.2026
Balraj Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
....Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH BINDLISH
Present:
Mr. Puneet Kansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Kavita, Advocate for the respondent(s)-Income Tax Department.
*****
DEEPAK SIBAL
, J (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the petitioner would also be entitled to the same relief as has been granted through a judgment of this Court dated 10.09.2026 passed in CWP-15791-2024 – Jyoti Sareen Vs. Union of India and others.
2. In the light of the above consensus, the petition is allowed in terms of Jyoti Sareen’s case (supra), resulting in quashing of the impugned notice dated 30.03.2023 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 alongwith consequential proceedings, if any. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
(SUNISH BINDLISH) 10.09.2026 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2026.09.12 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh