Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/11021/2026 of CHISHTIA KHANAM AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.11021 of 2026 Date of Decision:- 10.09.2026 Chishtia Khanam and another Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Ms. Neha, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
121
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.11021 of 2026 Date of Decision:- 10.09.2026
Chishtia Khanam and another Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Ms. Neha, Advocate for
Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate
for the petitioners.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent No.2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.3 and 4 and not to harass and implicate the petitioners in any false criminal case and also directing the official respondents to decide the representation dated 30.08.2026 (Annexure P-1) of the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are in a live-in-relationship. The private respondents are not accepting the said relationship and are extending threats to them. The copies of ‘Aadhaar’ cards of the petitioners have been placed on record.
3. Notice of motion. YAG DUTT 2026.09.11 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
CRWP No.11021 of 2026 -2-
4. Mr. Ravinder Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
5. Heard.
6. Without commenting upon the legality of the relationship, and further keeping in view the law laid down by a Division Bench in Yash Pal and another Versus State of Haryana and others (CRWP No.4660 of 2021, decided on 09.09.2024), the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 30.08.2026 (Annexure P-1) and take requisite action, if so warranted, as per the facts and circumstances of the matter in accordance with law.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) September 10, 2026
JUDGE Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.09.11 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.