Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/51341/2026 of SUKHVEER KOUR ALIAS KAUR Vs STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH AND OTEHRS on 10 September 2026
1- 132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRM-M-51341-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 SUKHVEER KOUR …PETITIONER V/S STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. P.P.S. Mahal, Advocate
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-51341-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 10.09.2026
SUKHVEER KOUR
…PETITIONER
V/S
STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
…RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present:
Mr. P.P.S. Mahal, Advocate and
Mr. S.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Tapan Masta, APP, U.T. Chandigarh.
****
SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petition under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeks following directions to official respondents:-
(i) To transfer investigation of complaint ICMS/2024.036570 dated 20.01.2025 from SSP, Chandigarh to any other competent authority.
(ii) To decide representation dated 20.01.2025.
(iii) To conduct fair and impartial investigation.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was cheated by respondent No.5 of Rs.6,60,000/- on the pretext of sending her abroad. In this regard, representation was moved to SSP, Chandigarh but no action was taken.
3. Notice of motion to official respondents only.
4. Mr. Tapan Masta, APP, U.T. Chandigarh, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that SUMIT SINGLA 2026.09.10 18:59 I agree to specified portions of this document petitioner’s representation would be decided at the earliest.
5. In the given facts and circumstances, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to decide representation dated 20.01.2025 (Annexure P3), in accordance with law by passing a reasoned, speaking order, within a period of 1 month from today and take necessary action, if so required.
6. However, if, respondent No.4 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation dated 20.01.2025 (Annexure P3), the petitioner shall be duly informed, as per mandate of law.
7. The petition stands disposed of.
8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)
JUDGE 10.09.2026 Sumit Singla Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SUMIT SINGLA 2026.09.10 18:59 I agree to specified portions of this document