Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/35458/2026 of DEEPAK @ DEEPAK BAINSLA AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 139 CRM-M-35458-2026 Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 Deepak @ Deepak Bainsla and others …Petitioners V/s The State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. R.K. Choudhary, Advocate, for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-35458-2026
Date of Decision: 10.09.2026
Deepak @ Deepak Bainsla and others
…Petitioners
V/s The State of Haryana
…Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present: Mr. R.K. Choudhary, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Amit Sahni, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)
The prayer in this petition preferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘the BNSS’) prays for the following substantive relief:- “Petition Under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to the erstwhile Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) for quashing and setting aside the impugned Order dated 18.11.2017 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palwal, whereby the Petitioners were declared as Proclaimed Offenders (P.O.) under Section 83 Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 353 dated 22.04.2017 (Annexure P-1), registered at Police Station Camp Palwal, District Palwal, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 379-B and 506 IPC (corresponding to the erstwhile Section 191(3), 190, 115, 118(2), 304, 351 BNS), the said order being illegal, without jurisdiction, in violation of mandatory statutory procedure, and a gross abuse of the process of law, so that the Petitioners may be enabled to appear before and face the regular trial before the concerned learned Trial Court, in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the police is still making attempts to arrest the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel representing the State, on the other hand, VIKAS CHANDER 2026.09.11 14:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-35458-2026
submits that pursuant to the petitioners having been declared proclaimed offenders, no FIR under Section 174A IPC was registered. He further submits that a closure report is ready and is being filed in the matter. He also submits, on instructions from SI Mahesh Kumar, Police Station Camp Palwal, that the police does not require the custody of the petitioners and, therefore, in the present matter, no arrest of the petitioners shall be made.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the statement given by learned State counsel, no grievance subsists and the present petition be disposed of in the said terms.
5. The petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the statements given by learned counsel for the parties.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE September 10, 2026 vcgarg
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2026.09.11 14:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document