CRM-M/51251/2026 of MANGAL SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 10 September 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-51251-2026

Date of Decision: 10.09.2026

Mangal Singh

…Petitioner

V/s State of Punjab

…Respondent

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL

Present: Mr. Robindeep Singh Bhullar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, Punjab.

*** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)

The prayer in the present petition preferred by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short the “BNSS”) is for the grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.164, dated 05.04.2026 registered at Police Station City Faridkot, District Faridkot, under Sections 319, 318(4), 335, 336, 340, 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short the “BNS”).

2. On a complaint submitted by one Manju Bala, Principal, SSBF, Khalsa Senior Secondary School, Faridkot, the FIR in question was registered. The allegation is that on 05.04.2026, an examination of Group ‘D’ posts was going on in the said school. Two of the appearing candidates were Mangal Singh (the present petitioner) and Davinder Singh. However, two persons namely Sunil Singh and Subeg Singh were found to be impersonating them and were appearing in the examination. Both were apprehended and ultimately it was found that Subeg Singh was in fact Baldev Singh.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. He submits that the petitioner had not appeared in the examinations and probably somebody else appeared. He further submits that the antecedents of the petitioner are clean and the VIKAS CHANDER 2026.09.11 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-51251-2026

petitioner is willing to join investigation and abide by any condition imposed by the Court.

4. Per contra, learned counsel representing the State has opposed the prayer for the grant of anticipatory bail by stating that the allegations are very serious as somebody else was impersonating the petitioner in an examination being conducted for recruitment to Group ‘D’ posts.

5. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

6. The allegations are extremely serious. The petitioner was a candidate for a group ‘D’ post . The examinations were being conducted in one of the centers i.e. SSBF, Khalsa Senior Secondary School, Faridkot on 05.04.2026. One Sunil Singh was found to be impersonating the petitioner. Merely because the said Sunil Singh has been granted regular bail would be no ground to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner as the parameters for both are entirely different.

7. Considering the nature of allegations, this Court does not find any reason to extend the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Still further, the anticipatory bail application of co-accused Davinder Singh was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 24.08.2026 passed in CRM-M- 47190-2026 and this Court finds no reason to take a different view in the present case.

8. That being so, the petition is found to be devoid of merit and the same is dismissed.

However, nothing stated herein above shall be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case.

(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)

JUDGE September 10, 2026 vcgarg

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable

: Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2026.09.11 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document