Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/45056/2026 of MUKUL MANJAL @ MUKUL MUNJAL Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
of 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 340 ***** CRM-M No.45056 of 2026 Date of decision : 10.9.2026 Date of uploading : 11.9.2026 Mukul Manjal @ Mukul Munjal ………….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others
CRM-M No.45056 of 2026 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
340
*****
CRM-M No.45056 of 2026
Date of decision : 10.9.2026
Date of uploading : 11.9.2026
Mukul Manjal @ Mukul Munjal
………….Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
…….Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: Mr. S.S. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Gaurav Gurcharan S. Rai, Senior DAG, Punjab
Ms. Manjot Kaur, Advocate, for respondents no.2 and 3
---
SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for quashing of FIR No.6 dated 10.2.2025 under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 13 of the Punjab Travel Professionals (Regulations) Act, 2014, registered at Police Station NRI, District Police Commissionerate Amritsar.
2. Faced with the situation that another person namely Jodh Singh is likely to be arraigned as an accused, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition in hand at this stage with liberty to file afresh after arraying all concerned in terms of dicta of judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in CRM-M No.48043 of 2023, titled Rakesh ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.09.11 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M No.45056 of 2026 -2-
Das v. State of Haryana and another, decided on 12.11.2024.
3. Ordered accordingly.
4. Needless to say that in case the petitioner-side revisit this Court, by way of a separate petition, for seeking quashing of the FIR in question etc., on the basis of compromise, the factum of the petitioner having deposited costs for the present petition, shall be taken note of.
(SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE 10.9.2026 Ashwanii
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.09.11 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document