Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/29369/2026 of PRERNA MALHOTRA Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 161 CWP-29369-2026 Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 Prerna Malhotra ....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH BINDLISH Present: Mr. Avneet Singh, Advocate
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
161
CWP-29369-2026
Date of Decision: 10.09.2026
Prerna Malhotra
....Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
....Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH BINDLISH
Present:
Mr. Avneet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sourabh Kapoor, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Rana Gurtej Singh, Jr. Standing Counsel for the respondent-Income Tax Department.
*****
DEEPAK SIBAL
, J (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the petitioner would also be entitled to the same relief as has been granted through a judgment of this Court dated 10.09.2026 passed in CWP-15791-2024 – Jyoti Sareen Vs. Union of India and others.
2. In the light of the above consensus, the petition is allowed in terms of Jyoti Sareen’s case (supra), resulting in quashing of the impugned notice dated 25.03.2026 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 alongwith consequential proceedings, if any. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
(SUNISH BINDLISH) 10.09.2026 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2026.09.11 13:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh