Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/10973/2026 of AMANDEEP KAUR AND ANR. Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.10973 of 2026 Date of Decision:- 10.09.2026 Amandeep Kaur and another Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Rudresh, Advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
118
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.10973 of 2026 Date of Decision:- 10.09.2026
Amandeep Kaur and another Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Rudresh, Advocate
for the petitioners.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7 and not to harass and implicate the petitioners in any false criminal case and also directing the official respondents to decide the representation dated 05.09.2026 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are in a live-in-relationship. The private respondents are not accepting the said relationship and are extending threats to them. The copies of ‘Aadhaar’ cards (Annexures P-1 and P-2) of petitioners No.1 and 2 have been placed on record. YAG DUTT 2026.09.11 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
CRWP No.10973 of 2026 -2-
3. Notice of motion.
4. Mr. Ravinder Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
5. Heard.
6. Without commenting upon the legality of the relationship, and further keeping in view the law laid down by a Division Bench in Yash Pal and another Versus State of Haryana and others (CRWP No.4660 of 2021, decided on 09.09.2024), the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 05.09.2026 (Annexure P-5) and take requisite action, if so warranted, as per the facts and circumstances of the matter in accordance with law.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) September 10, 2026
JUDGE Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.09.11 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.