Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/19150/2025 of PATNA SAHIB CHARITABLE EDUCATIONAL TRUST Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTIONS WARD, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.108 CWP-19150-2025 Date of decision : 11.07.2025 Patna Sahib Charitable Educational Trust .…. Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer Exemptions Ward, Chandigarh and others ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.108
CWP-19150-2025
Date of decision : 11.07.2025
Patna Sahib Charitable Educational Trust
.…. Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer Exemptions Ward,
Chandigarh and others
..... Respondents
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present :
Mr. Kartik Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Varun Issar, Senior Standing Counsel, with Ms. Paridhi Sandhu, Junior Standing Counsel, for the Income Tax Department.
* * * * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Challenge made through the instant petition is to the notice dated 16.04.2024 (Annexure P-1) issued to the petitioner by the respondents under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The primary ground of challenge raised by the petitioner is that the impugned notice has been issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer which could have not been done because in terms of the notification dated 29.03.2022 (Annexure P-2) issued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, the impugned notice could have been issued only by way of faceless assessment.
2. In support of his afore submission, learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the following two judgments of this Court:-
(i) CWP-15745-2024, titled Jatinder Singh Bhangu vs. Union of India and others, decided on 19.07.2024; and
(ii) CWP-21509-2023, titled Jasjit Singh vs. Union of India and others, decided on 29.07.2024.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the fact that the case of the petitioner is covered in its favour by the law laid down through the SHAMSHER SINGH 2025.07.17 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh CWP-19150-2025
[ 2 ]
aforesaid two judgments rendered by two different co-ordinate Benches of this Court in the cases of Jatinder Singh Bhangu and Jasjit Singh (supra).
4. In the light of the above, in terms of the law laid down in the cases of Jatinder Singh Bhangu and Jasjit Singh (supra), the impugned notice dated 16.04.2024 (Annexure P-1), issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer, is hereby quashed with liberty to the respondents to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law.
5. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
[DEEPAK SIBAL]
JUDGE
11.07.2025
[LAPITA BANERJI] shamsher
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2025.07.17 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh