Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/28427/2025 of HARBHAJAN SINGH Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER on 10 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.167 CWP-28427-2025 Date of decision: 10.09.2026 Harbhajan Singh ….Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3), Jalandhar ….Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH BINDLISH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.167
CWP-28427-2025
Date of decision: 10.09.2026
Harbhajan Singh
….Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3), Jalandhar
….Respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH BINDLISH
Present:
Mr. S.K. Mukhi, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Jr. Standing Counsel for the respondent.
* * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the petitioner would also be entitled to the same relief as has been granted through a judgment of this Court dated 10.09.2026 passed in CWP-15791-2024 – Jyoti Sareen vs. Union of India and others.
2. In the light of the above consensus, the petition is allowed in terms of Jyoti Sareen’s case (supra), resulting in quashing of the impugned notice dated 10.04.2024 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, alongwith consequential proceedings, if any. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (SUNISH BINDLISH) JUDGE September 10, 2026 Jyoti 1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JYOTI SHARMA 2026.09.13 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document