Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/9510/2023 of MUKESH GUPTA Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.209 CWP-9510-2023 Date of decision: 10.09.2026 Mukesh Gupta ….Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH BINDLISH Present: Mr. Anirudh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.209
CWP-9510-2023
Date of decision: 10.09.2026
Mukesh Gupta
….Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
….Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNISH BINDLISH
Present:
Mr. Anirudh Garg, Advocate and
Mr. Rishab Singla, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Ms. Gauri Neo Rampal, Sr. Standing Counsel (through VC)
for the respondents.
* * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the petitioner would also be entitled to the same relief as has been granted through a judgment of this Court dated 10.09.2026 passed in CWP-15791-2024 – Jyoti Sareen vs. Union of India and others.
2. In the light of the above consensus, the petition is allowed in terms of Jyoti Sareen’s case (supra), resulting in quashing of the impugned notice dated 06.04.2023 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, alongwith consequential proceedings, if any. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (SUNISH BINDLISH) JUDGE September 10, 2026 Jyoti 1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JYOTI SHARMA 2026.09.13 14:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document