Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/51106/2026 of AMRIK SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 127 CRM-M-51106-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.09.2026 AMRIK SINGH PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Anil Rathore, Advocate for the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Date of decision: 10.09.2026

AMRIK SINGH

PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL

Present:

Mr. Anil Rathore, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG Punjab.

***

Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023 seeks following reliefs: i) Direction to respondents No.2 to 4 to constitute Special Investigating Team (SIT) to conduct free, fair and transparent investigation in FIR No.140 dated 20.10.2025 under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023, Police Station, Banur, District Patiala, Punjab. ii) Direction to respondents No.2 to 4 to add Section 109 BNS in the aforementioned FIR.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s son suffered severe head injuries at the hands of private respondents. The aforementioned FIR was registered with regard to the incident but the police did not invoke Section 109 BNS against the accused. No action was taken upon registration of FIR and accused were still at large.

3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.09.11 12:04 I agree to specified portions of this document

4. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. He, on instructions from ASI Mohinder Singh, submits that all three accused in the FIR had been arrested. Investigation in the case was complete and challan was soon to be presented.

5. In view of the status of the case, informed by learned State counsel, no directions are required to be passed in the matter. Regarding non- invokation of Section 109 BNS, petitioner may avail appropriate remedy as may be available to him, in law.

6. The petition stands disposed of.

7. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)

JUDGE 10.09.2026 HS.CHAUHAN Whether Speaking/Reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No

HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.09.11 12:04 I agree to specified portions of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead