Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/51120/2026 of HARNEK SINGH Vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ORS. on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 128 CRM-M-51120-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.09.2026 HARNEK SINGH PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Ms. Amarinder Kaur, Advocate

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Date of decision: 10.09.2026

HARNEK SINGH

PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL

Present:

Ms. Amarinder Kaur, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Viren Sibal, Addl. P.P. U.T., Chandigarh.

***

Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023 seeks following reliefs: i) Direction to official respondents to take legal action against respondents No.4 and 5. ii) Direction to respondent No.2 to decide representation dated 28.07.2026.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was cheated of a sum of ₹3,00,000/- by private respondents on the pretext of sending her son abroad. Petitioner’s son was neither sent abroad nor the money was returned. Representation dated 28.07.2026 (Annexure P-4), in this regard was moved to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh for registration of FIR but no action was taken thereon.

3. Notice of motion to official respondents only.

4. Mr. Viren Sibal, Addl. P.P. U.T., Chandigarh accepts notice on behalf of official respondents and submits that the representation was received and was under process. HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.09.11 12:04 I agree to specified portions of this document

5. In view of the prayers made by the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh to decide the aforesaid representation dated 28.07.2026 (Annexures P-4), by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of 15 days from today and take necessary action as per law, if so required.

6. In case, official respondents do not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation (Annexure P-4), the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law.

7. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)

JUDGE 10.09.2026 HS.CHAUHAN Whether Speaking/Reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No

HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.09.11 12:04 I agree to specified portions of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead