CRM-M/31224/2026 of NEERAJ YADAV AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026

1. Sections 115 2023, Police consequentia dated 15.05.2

2. learned trial regard to com

THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIGA ADAV AND OTHERS VERSUS

HARYANA AND OTHERS

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Bhupinder Ghangas, Advoc for the petitioners. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryan

Mr. Jonti Phogat, Advocate for Mr. Anil Chahal, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5.

*** gh Nagpal, J. (Oral) Petitioners seek quashing of FIR 5, 190, 191(2), 333 and 351(2 e Station Civil Lines, Bhiwa al proceedings arising therefrom 2026. On 29.05.2026, this Court direc Court/Illaqa Magistrate for rec mpromise dated 15.05.2026.

NJAB AND HARYANA ARH CRM-M-31224-2026 Date of decision: 10.09.2026

…PETITIONERS

...RESPONDENTS LINI SINGH NAGPAL cate na. R No.58 dated 13.03.2026 under

2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, ani, District Bhiwani, and all m, on the basis of compromise cted the parties to appear before cording of their statements with r , l e e h JYOTI

3. learned Add Statement o 10.06.2026. Ludhiana ha have entered Point-wise re p

In compliance of the aforesaid ditional Chief Judicial Magist of Investigating Officer ASI R Learned Additional Chief J s submitted his report recording d into a valid compromise with eport as under has been submitte “1. That in the present FIR, six Yadav son of Manoj Kumar, Ma Kumar (minor), Sudha wife of M Kumar, Mukesh son of Mahend of Mahender Singh (petitioners) Kripa Ram Ki Dhani Rohtak Ga in the course of investigation Sanjogta wife of Manoj found in column No. 12 of the challan, accused persons named above a made thei statement about absconding/proclaimed person i

2. that in the present case, R resident of Kripa Ram Ki Dhani lent No. 2) is complainant and persons namely Ravinder son of Prem Parkash son of Ram S

d order, parties appeared before trate, Bhiwani on 02.06.2026. Rajesh was also recorded on Judicial Magistrate, Bhiwani, g satisfaction that all the parties hout any influence or coercion. d: accused persons namely Neeraj angopal @ Gopal son of Manoj Mukesh, Sanjogta wife of Manoj der Singh and Manoj Kumar son ), all residents of House No. 66, ate, Bhiwani are arraigned, and n, Sudha wife of Mukesh and nnocent and they are kept in the which is yet to be filec. All the appeared before this Court and compromise. No accused is in this case. avinder son of Prem Parkash, i, Rohtak Gate, Bhiwani (respon d in the present FIR, total four of Prem Parkash (complainant), Saroop, Krishna wife of Prem e . n , s . j j j n

d d e e d s

n r m JYOTI

4. factum of c continuation

5. Judgment of and another “Gian Singh petition is all

6. 333 and 351 Lines, Bhiwa

Parkash and Parmod son of Pr of them are aggrieved persons making statement about compro

(3) that the trial in this case has is yet to be filed.

(4) that the compromise b respondent No. 2 to 5 (accused p is voluntarily, an without an misrepresentation, coercion an result of free will of parties.

(5) that no any other crimina accused persons.” Learned State counsel has not r compromise. Since the matter of the criminal proceedings wou Following principles of law l this Court in “Kulwinder Singh ” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 h Versus State of Punjab and o lowed. FIR No.58 dated 13.03.2026 un 1(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanh ani, District Bhiwani, and all co

rem Parkash are injured and all s and all of them appeared for omise. s not been started as the challan between the petitioners and persons and complainant party) ny fear, pressure and greed, n undue influence etc. and is al case is pending against the raised any dispute regarding the has been amicably resolved, uld be an exercise in futility. laid down by the Full Bench h and others Vs. State of Punjab 2 and Hon’ble Supreme Court in others”(2012) 10 SCC 303, the nder Sections 115, 190, 191(2), hita, 2023, Police Station Civil onsequential proceedings arising l r n d )

s e e , h b n e , l g JYOTI

therefrom, ar 15.05.2026.

7. 10.09.2026 Jyoti-V

re quashed qua the petitioners, on Pending applications, if any, stan

Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable :

n the basis of compromise dated nd disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE

Yes/No

Yes/No d

) JYOTI