Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/21751/2026 of JAGTAR SINGH AND ORS Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR on 10 September 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 266 CRM-M-21751-2026 Date of Decision:10.09.2026 JAGTAR SINGH AND ORS ...Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL **** Present: Mr. Barjinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
266
CRM-M-21751-2026
Date of Decision:10.09.2026
JAGTAR SINGH AND ORS
...Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
****
Present:
Mr. Barjinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate for
Mr. Yuvraj Singh Sran, Advocate for respondent No.2.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
, J. (ORAL)
1. The prayer in this petition preferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘the BNSS’), is for quashing of FIR No.37 dated 22.03.2026, registered at Police Station Cheema, District Sangrur, under Sections 331(6), 126(2), 115(2), 324(4), 191(3), 190 of BNS, 2023, along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the petitioners and respondent No.2 (Annexure P-2).
2. The report dated 01.05.2026 received from the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sunam, through the office of the District & Sessions Judge, Sangrur, filed in the Registry, is taken on record.
3. Vide order dated 21.04.2026, a Coordinate Bench had directed the parties to appear before the Area Magistrate/trial Court for getting their statements recorded with regard to the compromise (ibid).
4. The Area Magistrate/trial Court was to submit a report in this NISHA 2026.09.11 18.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Page 1 of 2
CRM-M-21751-2026 -2- regard in terms of the said order.
5. Pursuant to the order dated 21.04.2026, the parties appeared before the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sunam, and as per the report dated 01.05.2026 submitted to this Court, both parties got their respective statements recorded.
6. A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. The powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the BNSS can be exercised in such like situations in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the directions issued by the Apex Court in “Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543” and a Five Judges Bench of this Court in “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052”.
7. In view of the aforesaid report of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sunam accompanied by statements of both the parties, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.37 dated 22.03.2026, registered at Police Station Cheema, District Sangrur, under Sections 331(6), 126(2), 115(2), 324(4), 191(3), 190 of BNS, 2023, with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE September 10, 2026 Nisha-1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No NISHA 2026.09.11 18.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…