CRM-M/60301/2025 of MOHD ABBAS AND ORS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS on 10 September 2026

1. under Sectio Sanhita, 2023 and all con compromise

2. learned trial regard to com

THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIGA BAS AND ORS

VERSUS

HARYANA AND ORS

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Jugraj Singh Chouhan, Adv Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Adv for the petitioners. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryan

Mr. Sagar Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Himanshu Rajput, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.

*** gh Nagpal, J. (Oral) Petitioners seek quashing of ns 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2) 3, Police Station Yamuna Nagar nsequential proceedings arising dated 29.09.2025. On 30.10.2025, this Court direc Court/Illaqa Magistrate for rec mpromise dated 29.09.2025.

NJAB AND HARYANA ARH CRM-M-60301-2025 Date of decision: 10.09.2026

…PETITIONERS

...RESPONDENTS LINI SINGH NAGPAL vocate for vocate na.

e FIR No.252 dated 14.07.2025 and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya r Sadar, District Yamuna Nagar g therefrom, on the basis of cted the parties to appear before cording of their statements with a r f e h JYOTI

3. learned Judic Division), Y Investigating Learned Judi Division), Y satisfaction t any influence

1.

2.

3.

4.

4. factum of c continuation

5. Judgment of and another “Gian Singh petition is all

In compliance of the aforesaid cial Magistrate First Class-cum Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri o g Officer SI Lakhwinder Masih icial Magistrate First Class-cum Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, has that all the parties have entered i e or coercion. Report as under ha Number of persons arrayed accused in the FIR Whether any accused proclaimed offender Stage of the trial/proceedings Whether the compromise genuine, voluntary and with any coercion or und influence

Learned State counsel has not r compromise. Since the matter of the criminal proceedings wou Following principles of law l this Court in “Kulwinder Singh ” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 h Versus State of Punjab and o lowed.

d order, parties appeared before m-Additional Civil Judge(Senior on 28.11.2025. Statement of h was recorded on 29.11.2025. m-Additional Civil Judge(Senior submitted her report recording into a valid compromise without as been submitted: d as 6 is No s Investigation pending and challan not received is hout due Yes raised any dispute regarding the has been amicably resolved, uld be an exercise in futility. laid down by the Full Bench h and others Vs. State of Punjab 2 and Hon’ble Supreme Court in others”(2012) 10 SCC 303, the e r f . r g t e , h b n e JYOTI

6. 190, 191(2) Yamuna Na proceedings of compromi

7. 10.09.2026 Jyoti-V

FIR No.252 dated 14.07.2025 and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya agar Sadar, District Yamuna arising therefrom, are quashed q ise dated 29.09.2025. Pending applications, if any, stan

Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable :

under Sections 115(2), 118(1), a Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Nagar and all consequential qua the petitioners, on the basis nd disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE

Yes/No

Yes/No , n l s

) JYOTI